heartbeat can be configured active-active, no?
On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 14:59, Dan Goscomb wrote:
> however, i need, as explained, both machines active at the same time...
> active-active... not active-standby
>
>
> On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 20:10, Kashif Shaikh wrote:
> > Have you checked out www.linux-ha.org?
> >
> > If you just want to have the IP as 'highly available', then I suggest
> > you check out heartbeat(available on the linux-ha website).
> >
> > If one machine fails, another machine would take over the IP address.
> >
> > Kashif
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 14:11, Dan Goscomb wrote:
> > > i do not want to use any load directors... believe me i've looked at
> > > everything and i would prefer an app switch, but cost is a major issue
> > > here. i have 2 machines to work with, and that is it.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 19:09, an unknown sender wrote:
> > > > Em Quinta 15 Maio 2003 13:53, Dan Goscomb escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > Maybe what you're looking for is ldirectord, it's more reliable than round
> > > > robin DNS and far easier to set up than failsafe:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.vergenet.net/linux/ldirectord/
> > > >
> > > > rgrds,
> > > > Br?ulio Gergull
> > > > GetNet Comunica??es Ltda.
> > > > http://www.getnet.com.br/
> > > > http://www.suse-brasil.com.br/
> > > >
> > > > > thats what i thought i had explained i wanted!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 17:42, Michael Gesundheit wrote:
> > > > > > Why should you use ip aliasing??
> > > > > > You can have the survived server alias the dead server IP until it
> > > > > > will be fixed or whatever.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Michael
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dan Goscomb <dang at cashcade.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to configure a 2 node cluster where each machine
> > > > > > has a
> > > > > > unique IP address and both are accessible at the same time
> > > > > > (via round
> > > > > > robin DNS).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like it so that if one machine went down the other
> > > > > > would take
> > > > > > over its IP address... this, i would imagine, would involve 2
> > > > > > clusters... one with machine 1 as the primary and machine 2
> > > > > > secondary,
> > > > > > and one with machine 2 as the primary and machine 1 secondary.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is this possible and if so could someone send me an example
> > > > > > config?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dan.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Dan Goscomb
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > LinuxFailSafe mailing list
> > > > > > LinuxFailSafe at lists.community.tummy.com
> > > > > > http://lists.community.tummy.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxfailsafe
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Michael
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> > > --
> > > Dan Goscomb <dang at cashcade.co.uk>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > LinuxFailSafe mailing list
> > > LinuxFailSafe at lists.community.tummy.com
> > > http://lists.community.tummy.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxfailsafe
> >
> --
> Dan Goscomb <dang at cashcade.co.uk>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxFailSafe mailing list
> LinuxFailSafe at lists.community.tummy.com
> http://lists.community.tummy.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxfailsafe